It may be lost on Trump, but Ukraine’s battle against Russia’s invasion is just remarkable.
George F. Will
June 4, 2025
The Washington Post
Ukraine’s breathtaking ingenuity, the latest example of which destroyed or damaged dozens of Russia’s long-range bombers on bases 2,500 miles from Ukraine, is in the service of an unflagging valor reminiscent of Britain’s in 1940, when it was isolated and embattled, with the German army at the English Channel. Ukraine’s resilience is inconvenient for those Americans who are eager to proclaim that the geographically largest nation entirely within Europe is inevitably doomed to defeat, dismemberment and domination.
Such Americans’ unseemly “realism” has them invested in, and even eager for, Ukraine’s disappearance from the map of European nations. Those Americans should remember Winston Churchill’s 1941 response to French military “realists” who had said in 1940 that Britain would soon have its neck wrung like a chicken. Said Churchill: “Some chicken. Some neck.”
Today’s faux “realism” cannot fathom what is at stake in Ukraine. Michael Kimmage can. The director of the Wilson Center’s Kennan Institute, writing in Foreign Affairs, says Putin has “renormalized the idea of large-scale war as a means of territorial conquest.” Putin is, therefore, undoing a war aim enunciated before the United States entered World War II. In August 1941, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Churchill, meeting on warships in Placentia Bay, off Newfoundland, propounded the Atlantic Charter, item two of which looked to a future without “territorial changes that do not accord with the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned.”
It was to buttress this principle that President George H.W. Bush in 1991 orchestrated a broad coalition of nations for the limited but luminous purpose of forcing Iraq to leave Kuwait. It was for this principle that in 1982 British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher sent British forces to the South Atlantic to undo Argentina’s seizure of the Falkland Islands. An Argentine intellectual dismissed this military event as “a fight between two bald men over a comb.” Actually, it was a fight for a principle that again seems perishable.
Vice President JD Vance uses flippancy, as adolescents do, for the fun of being naughty: “I don’t really care what happens to Ukraine one way or the other.” He has dismissed as “moralistic garbage” a distinguished historian’s mildly different opinion about Ukraine’s prospects. Vance wonders whether Niall Ferguson of Stanford’s Hoover Institution is “aware of the reality on the ground, of the numerical advantage of the Russians, of the depleted stock of the Europeans or their even more depleted industrial base.”
Ukraine, says Vance, never had “any pathway to victory.” Vance’s ventriloquist, the U.S. president, has called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky a “dictator,” although it is unclear how much disapproval Trump conveys using that term. Trump has said to Zelensky, “You don’t
have the cards.” But Dmytro Kuleba, Ukraine’s minister of foreign affairs from 2020 to 2024, writing May 30 in Foreign Affairs, says:
“In December 2023, Russia controlled approximately 42,000 square miles of Ukrainian territory. In December 2024, that figure had grown only slightly, to around 43,600 square miles. As of late May, Russia held approximately 43,650. The country supposedly holding all the cards has gained just 1,650 of Ukraine’s 233,030 square miles over the last 16 months. Moscow has gone from occupying about 18 percent of Ukrainian territory in late 2023 to roughly 19 percent today.”
Russia, which Sen. John McCain called a “gas station masquerading as a country,” has one third of the European Union’s population and one-tenth of the E.U.’s gross domestic product, and last year had more than half a million more deaths than births. Writing in the Atlantic, Anna Nemtsova, a Daily Beast correspondent who covers Eastern Europe, reports: “According to one demographer, Russians may have had fewer children from January to March 2025 than in any three-month period over the past 200 years.”
Although some people similar to Vance admired British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain’s “realism” at Munich in 1938, Dalibor Rohac of the American Enterprise Institute cautions that it is “misleading and ahistorical” to compare Ukraine’s vulnerability in coming negotiations to Czechoslovakia’s in the negotiations that presaged its takeover by Germany: Czechoslovakia was not forced to acquiesce to a fatal agreement “after defending itself successfully against Nazi military might for three years.”
President Donald Trump finds Russia “easier to deal with” than Ukraine, perhaps because he agrees more with Russia. Vance says Trump might walk away from peace talks if Putin is not “serious” about them. So, Vance has notified Putin that simply by being unserious about negotiations, he might provoke Trump to show that among the things he is unserious about is the principle affirmed at Placentia Bay.
The comments largely draw parallels between Ukraine’s resilience against Russia and Britain’s stand against Germany in 1940, highlighting the bravery and leadership of Zelensky akin to Churchill. Many express disappointment in the current U.S. leadership, particularly Trump and Vance.
George F. Will writes a twice-weekly column on politics and domestic and foreign affairs. He began his column with The Post in 1974, and he received the Pulitzer Prize for commentary in 1977. His latest book, “American Happiness and Discontents,” was released in September 2021.follow on X@georgewill